Skip to content

Journey: Why was the 100ml liquid restrict at airports launched?

A foiled terrorist plot in 2006 led to a wave of modifications within the UK (Image: Getty Pictures)

In a matter of years, airports may ditch their ban on liquids over 100ml in hand baggage.

Many people have been compelled to handover shampoo bottles mistakenly packed within the flawed bag or – even worse – costly alcohol purchased as a memento.

At present, liquids should not exceed 100ml and must be carried in a transparent plastic bag.

However a transfer to backtrack on the ban, described as a ‘game-changer’ by airport bosses, will save passengers numerous time in queues for safety.

In accordance with John Holland-Kaye, the chief government of Heathrow, the rule might be scrapped nationwide by 2024.

The implementation of recent scanning techniques will negate the necessity for strict guidelines on liquids, he instructed the Occasions.

Airports out with the UK, resembling Shannon Airport in Eire, have already moved away from the rule.

However why was the 100ml restrict launched?

Liquids in hand luggage currently must be less than 100ml and carried in a clear bag (Picture: Getty)

Liquids in hand baggage presently should be lower than 100ml and carried in a transparent bag (Image: Getty)

Airports had already drastically modified following the 9/11 assaults.

Earlier than then there have been only a few limits on what you can deliver onto the aircraft, and even knives, as much as 4 inches in size, have been permitted.

All that modified following the 2006 transatlantic plane plot.

Terrorists had been poised to smuggle liquid explosives via safety by disguising them as delicate drinks.

They deliberate to hold the explosives aboard planes touring from the UK to the USA and Canada.

Scene of a police raid on Forest Road, Walthamstow, London, near the corner of Brookdale Road, 10 August 2006.

The scene of a police raid on Forest Highway, Walthamstow, London, in relation to the foiled plot (Image: : Wikimedia/David Gerard)

Abdulla Ahmed Ali was one man watched by police as a part of a wider investigation into the plot.

He returned from Pakistan in June 2006 and, when investigators covertly opened his baggage, they discovered a powdered delicate drink—Tang—and a lot of batteries.

Within the following weeks the police mounted the UK’s largest surveillance operation into the plot, calling on an extra 220 officers from different forces.

Assad Sarwar, from Excessive Wycombe, had met with Ali in an east London park and have become an individual of curiosity within the case.

When tailed by officers, he was seen shopping for gadgets ‘that didn’t appear constant along with his each day wants’.

MI5 covertly entered the flat being utilized by Ali and located what gave the impression to be a bomb manufacturing unit.

Bottle of Lucozade.  (Photo by: Newscast/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

Explosives have been to be smuggled via safety in delicate drink bottles (Image: Getty Pictures)

Additional investigations – resembling secret cameras and microphones – gave proof that gadgets have been being constructed out of drink bottles.

Ali was later watched by surveillance officers at an Web cafe, the place he spent two hours researching flight timetables.

Arrests have been made and police carried out raids on various properties forward of a prolonged trial.

On 10 August 2006, British Dwelling Secretary John Reid, broke the information of the foiled plot, together with Douglas Alexander, the Transport Secretary.

UNITED KINGDOM - AUGUST 11: UK Secretary of State for Transport Douglas Alexander speaks during a news conference at the Home Office, in London, UK, Friday, August 11, 2006. When UK police thwarted a plot to blow up airliners bound for the US , they exposed a weakness in aviation security and created a new focus in the war on terror: liquid explosives.  (Photo by Suzanne Plunkett/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Former UK Secretary of State for Transport, Douglas Alexander, knowledgeable the general public of the thwarted plot to explode airliners sure for the US (Image: Getty Pictures)

The identical day, Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Paul Stephenson, stated {that a} plot, supposed to destroy as many as ten plane in mid-flight from the UK to the USA utilizing explosives introduced on board within the suspects’ hand baggage , had been disrupted.

On account of the incident, unprecedented safety measures have been initially carried out at airports.

New guidelines launched on August 10 2006 resulted in lots of of canceled flights, lengthy delays and queues at UK airports.

On the time, Metro reported: ‘Politicians, airport operators and airline chiefs had labored via the evening to be prepared to herald the brand new guidelines, however there was solely a lot warning that might be given to passengers at one of many busiest instances of the yr for air journey.

Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Paul Stevenson stated as many as ten plane have been focused underneath the failed plot (Image: AFP)

‘At first, no hand baggage was allowed on plans in a transfer spelled out by the then Transport Secretary Douglas Alexander, who had interrupted his vacation on the island of Mull to supervise the safety preparations with the then Dwelling Secretary John Reid.

‘What adopted at airports was chaos. At Heathrow airport British Airways canceled scores of flights and different airways additionally needed to ax providers as big queues constructed up.

‘Within the weeks that adopted hand baggage of a sure measurement was allowed on flights once more, however liquids in carry-on baggage have been restricted to 100ml in measurement – a restriction nonetheless in place.’

Vacationers have been stated to be ‘confused’ by how restrictions appeared so changeable relying on the place on the earth they have been flying from or to.

As is the case at present, there have been completely different rules from airline to airline.

In 2006, Metro reported: ‘But regardless of the elevated aggravation, the general public’s want to fly was undiminished. Nothing – not concern of terrorism, nor lengthy queues, nor the credit score crunch – deterred Britons from wishing to jet off to international climates.’

Get in contact with our information workforce by emailing us at

For extra tales like this, verify our information web page.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *