Skip to content

Tacoma Metropolis Council bans tenting inside 10 blocks of momentary shelters starting Nov. 14

The ordinance makes public tenting inside the impacted areas a misdemeanor offense punishable by as much as a $250 high quality or as much as 30 days in jail.

TACOMA, Wash. — The Tacoma Metropolis Council authorized an ordinance banning tenting on public property inside 10 blocks of momentary shelters Tuesday night time.

The ordinance, sponsored by Councilmembers John Hines, Joe Bushnell and Sarah Rumbaugh, makes tenting and storing belongings inside ten blocks of a short lived shelter inside Tacoma a misdemeanor offense. An modification to the ordinance put ahead by Tacoma Mayor Victoria Woodards additionally bans tenting inside 200 toes of protected waterways just like the Puyallup River, the Thea Foss Waterway, Wapato Creek and the shores of Graduation Bay.

The Metropolis stated in a launch it’s going to work to make sure that the “least restrictive voluntary enforcement strategies doable” are used earlier than folks face penalties. The utmost punishment for violating the ordinance is a $250 high quality or as much as 30 days in jail.

The town deliberate to think about a ban on tenting on public property final 12 months, however the proposal was nixed out of concern for the variety of folks with private property on public lands.

It is estimated there are greater than 4,300 homeless folks in Pierce County based mostly on this summer time’s point-in-time rely. The county would not have nightly shelter area out there for two,970 of these 4,300 people.

The brand new ordinance will go into impact on Nov. 14, which Mayor Victoria Woodards stated is identical day a brand new low-barrier shelter will open in Tacoma. It impacts a ten block radius round 9 momentary shelters within the Hilltop Enterprise District, the Lincoln Enterprise District, the Fern Hill Enterprise District, the Dome District and the South Tacoma Enterprise District.

The ordinance asserts the 10-block buffer will “present enough area and security measures to make sure the safety of the group and people staying at these shelters in opposition to the antagonistic impacts of unsanctioned tenting.”

Dozens of individuals signed as much as give public feedback at Tuesday night time’s assembly. The bulk spoke in opposition to the ordinance and stated it might criminalize homelessness and impose unjust penalties on folks struggling to outlive. These in help cited issues over public security.

Councilmembers Hines, Bushnell, Walker, Diaz, Rumbaugh and Mayor Woodards voted in favor. Deputy Mayor Catherine Ushka and Councilmembers Keith Blocker and Kiara Daniels voted no.

When the vote was accomplished some group members yelled ‘disgrace’ at council members. Mayor Woodards referred to as for a recess.

Hines stated the ordinance clearly connects the concept that town is addressing encampments in locations the place shelter is already supplied. Hines additionally stated the ordinance might assist town arrange extra shelters by addressing the issues of neighbors who could also be afraid encampments will pop up close by.

Deputy Mayor Ushka spoke out in opposition to the ordinance, saying she did not suppose the ordinance was enforceable or that will probably be efficient. She additionally stated she couldn’t help an ordinance which will put monetary boundaries on these impacted.

“I will oppose this ban for a lot of causes, however ultimately, I can not go one thing that makes financial problem a felony offence,” she stated.

Councilmember Blocker joined Ushka in saying he did not suppose the ordinance would work.

“I do not suppose that is the answer,” Blocker stated. “I do suppose this ordinance is off the mark. It isn’t going to get us what we wish, I believe it should trigger extra hurt than good in the long term.”

Councilmembers Bushnell, Ogly Diaz and Mayor Woodards voted in favor of the ban, regardless of all three saying they had been conflicted about supporting it. Woodards stated the one motive she was voting in favor was that town is ready to supply a low-barrier shelter.

“I am not voting for this in order that we will criminalize homelessness, I am voting for this so we will get folks to just accept the providers that we provide,” Woodards stated. “I do not know if this ordinance will try this, however what I do know is that what we have been doing hasn’t been in a position to try this.”

WATCH: KING 5’s Tackling the Homelessness Epidemic playlist

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *