Skip to content

New Missouri legislation banning homeless from tenting on state-owned property inflicting confusion, questions

SPRINGFIELD, Mo. (KY3) – The beginning of the brand new 12 months additionally introduced a brand new Missouri legislation that stops the homeless from tenting on state-owned property and several other different homeless-related matters.

Home Invoice 1606 was handed final summer season amidst many questions and issues.

Springfield’s Metropolis Council reviewed the invoice’s ramifications in October with a much less enthusiastic reception.

“We do not consider the invoice is written in a really high-quality method,” mentioned Springfield Metropolis Supervisor Jason Gage.

And now that the invoice has develop into legislation, the issues have not gone away.

“On paper, there’s one factor,” identified Adam Bodendieck, the Director of Homeless Providers for the Neighborhood Partnership of the Ozarks. “However as you discuss to people concerned, every query results in one other query.”

“Earlier than the language was handed, earlier than it was signed, and earlier than it went into impact, we have been asking for clarification that it hasn’t actually come,” added Sarah Owsley, the Coverage and Advocacy Director for Empower Missouri.

Each the Neighborhood Partnership of the Ozarks and Empower Missouri function advocates for the state’s homeless, and Empower Missouri is the oldest and largest anti-poverty group within the state, having been round for 120 years.

“I actually consider most attorneys need to enhance their group’s situations,” Owsley mentioned. “However no non-profit homeless service suppliers provided help of this language, and there is actually nobody within the state who thought it was an awesome thought. So it was irritating to see it transfer ahead anyway regardless of the numerous flaws which were identified very early within the course of.”

The Neighborhood Partnership of the Ozarks has been working with different homeless service suppliers across the nation who’ve handled related legal guidelines and have needed to reply inquiries from these out within the streets about what they need to do now that it is towards the legislation to camp on state -owned property.

“They’re asking, ‘What does that imply? What do I do? The place do I’m going?’” Bodendieck mentioned. “However there are a number of unknowns despite the fact that January 1st has come and gone, and this invoice is now in impact. We’re working with different businesses who’ve been by way of this to try to work out what it means and what impacts the legislation might need. However no one appears to have a complete deal with on it. There isn’t any clear roadmap we have seen in any state. So we’re in a holding sample whereas we work by way of all these points and questions.”

“The primary query we had was what actually qualifies as state-owned land?” Owsley added. “One interpretation might be any land throughout the state, even when it is owned by a non-public firm or by town. I haven’t got clarification of that as I drive down the highway, and I do not consider most of our legislation enforcement officers do both.”

The legislation additionally says that the state Lawyer Basic can sue cities that do not implement the legal guidelines. New Lawyer Basic Andrew Bailey was requested after his swearing-in ceremony this week if the brand new homeless legislation could be a precedence for him.

“And it’s. Completely,” he replied. “I am devoted to the principal that I am right here to implement the legal guidelines as written.”

“Cities are unclear what meaning,” Owsley mentioned. “And cities usually do not need to spend the assets or time on this. Most legislation enforcement officers I’ve interacted with don’t need to spend their time harassing people who find themselves experiencing homelessness. That doesn’t clear up the issue or maintain our group any safer, and it really will increase the dangers. It forces the homeless to cover from view, which will increase their danger of violence and hurt. It’s going to usually push them onto personal property, farmland or different areas the place they’re much less more likely to get their wants met.”

One other a part of the brand new legislation says state funding ought to be used just for short-term shelters, which places homeless service suppliers within the center as a result of federal funding is awarded long-term housing because the precedence.

“Primarily, you have acquired mother telling you one factor and pa telling you one other factor, and you have to work out stroll the road,” Bodendieck mentioned.

And whether or not it is a lawsuit filed by Eden Village or a legislative invoice filed within the present session by Springfield State Consultant Crystal Quade that might strike down the homeless legislation, Owsley believes one thing will occur to deal with the inconsistencies within the new coverage.

“It is unlikely that this legislation goes untouched within the subsequent a number of months,” she mentioned. “We would actually wish to see a decision that preserves the dignity and value of our neighbors who dwell outside and never make homelessness tougher and fewer secure.”

“We would similar to to get some path on transfer ahead,” Bodendieck added.”

To report a correction or typo, please e-mail


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *